( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: useDefList in C:\wamp\www\icicis2019\templates\jpeople\html\com_content\article\default.php on line 51
Call Stack
#TimeMemoryFunctionLocation
10.0003247296{main}( )..\index.php:0
20.08284488288JApplicationCms->execute( )..\index.php:49
30.08284488488JApplicationSite->doExecute( )..\cms.php:261
40.15048664016JApplicationSite->dispatch( )..\site.php:230
50.15378752048JComponentHelper::renderComponent( )..\site.php:191
60.15468771280JComponentHelper::executeComponent( )..\helper.php:380
70.15488803752require_once( 'C:\wamp\www\icicis2019\components\com_content\content.php' )..\helper.php:405
80.15819116344JControllerLegacy->execute( )..\content.php:38
90.15819116632ContentController->display( )..\legacy.php:702
100.211410886376JControllerLegacy->display( )..\controller.php:113
110.215011113416ContentViewArticle->display( )..\legacy.php:664
120.279612942432JViewLegacy->display( )..\view.html.php:178
130.279612942944JViewLegacy->loadTemplate( )..\legacy.php:216
140.280913002336include( 'C:\wamp\www\icicis2019\templates\jpeople\html\com_content\article\default.php' )..\legacy.php:677

Papers for refereed publication will be reviewed by at least two referees selected from a panel of peers approved by the International Program Committee (IPC). The paper must be accepted by at least two referees receiving the "refereed" label in the proceedings. All accepted papers will be published in the conference Proceeding .

The 2019 IEEE ICICIS conference Proceeding  will be included in the IEEE Xplore and traditionally indexed by other important databases, such as , SCOPUS, EI, DBLP, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore Digital Library

 

The review process is "double blind" - identification of both authors and referees is removed from all documentation. The Conference IPC believes that the review of papers gives conference participants and other readers some confidence in the quality of the papers specified as "refereed" in the proceedings.

As a note to the papers' authors the following checklist will be used by the reviewers
to evaluate the quality of the papers:

1* Scope
  • Very High
  • High
  • Normal
  • Low
  • Very Low
 
2* Novelity
  • Very High
  • High
  • Normal
  • Low
  • Very Low
3* Significance
  • Very High
  • High
  • Normal
  • Low
  • Very Low
4* Well Structure
  • Very High
  • High
  • Normal
  • Low
  • Very Low
5* Well Writing
  • Very High
  • High
  • Normal
  • Low
  • Very Low
6Notes for Authors
Type: Comment
7* Decision
  • Highly rejected
  • Reject
  • accept if space
  • Accept
  • Highly Accept

logoBUEh244